Last updated: October 7, 2026
The best compact excavators for small contractors are the Kubota U17-3α, Bobcat E20, Takeuchi TB216, Yanmar ViO17, and JCB 19C-1, with the right choice depending more on access, transport, lifting, and attachment work than on digging depth alone.
Quick comparison
Specifications vary with canopy, cab, counterweight, tracks, blade, and optional equipment. Treat the figures below as approximate published specifications and verify the exact configuration before buying.
1.2 Ton Mini Excavator Set, 13.5HP Digger with 4 Attachments & Canopy
Included for 'Best Compact Excavators for Small Contractors' because the listing specifies 13.5HP Digger with 4 Attachments & Canopy, details this guide uses to compare options.
View on Amazon
Mini Excavator, 1.2 Ton Compact Rubber Tracked Digger,13.5HP Gasoline Engine,EPA Certified,with Hydraulic Thumb,400mm&200mm Toothed Bucket,for Landscaping, Farm, Garden&Small DIY Construction
Included for 'Best Compact Excavators for Small Contractors' because the listing specifies 1.2 Ton Compact Rubber Tracked Digger and 13.5HP Gasoline Engine, details this guide uses to compare options.
View on Amazon
RELYMG Mini Excavator,1.2 Ton Compact Rubber Tracked Excavator 13.5HP Gasoline Engine EPA Certified with Hydraulic Thumb,Bucket,Auger,rake,Toolbox,for Landscaping, Farm,Garden&Small DIY Construction
Included for 'Best Compact Excavators for Small Contractors' because the listing specifies Bucket and Auger, details this guide uses to compare options.
View on Amazon
BisonTek 1.4 Ton Mini Excavator with-Kubota Diesel Engine, Compact Crawler Digger with Side Swing & Quick Coupler, Hydraulic Thumb Clamp & Bucket for Farm, Garden, Trenching, Landscaping (RED+4)
Included for 'Best Compact Excavators for Small Contractors' because the listing specifies Compact Crawler Digger with Side Swing & Quick Coupler and Hydraulic Thumb Clamp & Bucket for Farm, details this guide uses to compare options.
View on Amazon| Model | Operating weight | Maximum dig depth | Tail-swing design | Approximate transport width | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kubota U17-3α | About 1,720 kg / 3,790 lb | About 2.31 m / 7 ft 7 in | Minimal or zero tail swing, depending on version | About 0.99–1.24 m / 39–49 in | General contracting in restricted spaces |
| Bobcat E20 | About 1,900 kg / 4,190 lb | About 2.57 m / 8 ft 5 in | Minimal tail swing | About 1.36 m / 54 in | Digging depth and operator familiarity |
| Takeuchi TB216 | About 1,865 kg / 4,113 lb | About 2.39 m / 7 ft 10 in | Conventional compact tail swing | About 1.30 m / 51 in | Durable everyday site work |
| Yanmar ViO17 | About 1,790 kg / 3,946 lb | About 2.25 m / 7 ft 5 in | True zero tail swing | About 0.95–1.32 m / 37–52 in | Working beside walls and property lines |
| JCB 19C-1 | About 1,900 kg / 4,190 lb | About 2.57 m / 8 ft 5 in | Reduced tail swing | About 1.33 m / 52 in | Contractors wanting a deeper, heavier machine |
Best choices by working situation
See also: How Many Watts of Solar Do You Need for Van Life? • Truma vs Webasto Water Heaters for Vans: Combi, Aquago and Alternatives
Best all-rounder: Kubota U17-3α
The U17-3α is a strong middle ground for small contractors. Its retractable undercarriage can narrow the machine for gates and landscaping access, then widen for better stability. The minimal-tail-swing layout is useful beside foundations, driveways, and retaining walls.
Its roughly 1.7-ton operating weight is still manageable on a suitable trailer, while the machine has enough hydraulic capacity for buckets, hydraulic thumbs, augers, breakers, and compact grading attachments. Choose it when your work includes regular trenching, drainage, utility preparation, and residential excavation rather than one specialized task.
Best for extremely tight sites: Yanmar ViO17
The ViO17’s true zero-tail-swing design keeps the rear of the machine within the track footprint during rotation. That matters when the operator must swing between a building and a fence or work close to traffic without repeatedly repositioning.
Zero tail swing does not mean zero risk. The boom, counterweight height, bucket, and load can still strike obstacles. It can also provide less rear counterweight than a conventional machine, so lifting over the side may be more restrictive. Study the lift chart rather than assuming the machine can safely handle a load because it fits within the bucket.
Best for deeper digging: Bobcat E20 or JCB 19C-1
With maximum digging depth around 2.57 m, the E20 and 19C-1 offer more reach than many machines in the 1.7-ton class. That extra depth is valuable for deeper drainage runs, footings, septic-related excavation, and basement-side work.
The trade-off is size. A machine around 1.9 tons with a roughly 1.3-to-1.36 m transport width may not pass through narrow residential gates. It also requires a trailer, tow vehicle, and tie-down system rated for the combined machine, attachments, fuel, and tools.
Best for rugged daily use: Takeuchi TB216
The TB216 is a conventional compact excavator with a reputation for a straightforward, durable layout. Its approximately 1.865-ton weight gives it useful stability for trenching and material handling, although its tail swing needs more clearance than a zero-tail-swing alternative.
It is a sensible choice for contractors who have adequate site access and value a machine suited to repeated digging, loading, and grading. Check local dealer support carefully: parts availability and service response can matter more than a small difference in rated horsepower.
How the key buying criteria affect the decision
Operating weight and transport
Operating weight is not the same as trailer weight. Add the bucket, hydraulic thumb, quick coupler, spare attachments, fuel, chains, and accessories before checking your trailer’s legal and practical capacity.
For example, a 1,900 kg excavator plus a 450 kg trailer, 100 kg bucket and coupler, and 100 kg of equipment creates a loaded estimate of 2,550 kg before any extra attachment. A trailer rated at 2,700 kg leaves little margin. A machine that appears towable on paper may therefore require a heavier trailer or a different vehicle.
Dig depth and reach
Maximum dig depth is measured under ideal boom, arm, and bucket positions. Real production can be lower, especially when digging close to a wall or when the machine is positioned on uneven ground. Compare maximum reach, dump height, arm breakout force, and the available bucket sizes as well as depth.
Tail swing and stability
Zero or minimal tail swing reduces the clearance needed behind the machine, but it does not eliminate the need for a stable setup. When lifting, capacity usually changes significantly with the load over the side versus over the blade. A machine with a conventional counterweight may lift more confidently in some positions, while a zero-tail-swing model may save time in confined areas.
Lift capacity
Use the manufacturer’s lift chart for the exact boom, arm, track width, blade position, and attachment. Small excavators in this weight class can often lift several hundred kilograms close to the blade, but capacity may fall sharply at maximum reach or over the side. Keep the load low, level the machine, use a rated lifting point, and never substitute bucket breakout force for lifting capacity.
Attachment compatibility
Before choosing a machine, list the work you expect to sell:
- A hydraulic thumb for sorting rocks, placing pipe, and handling logs.
- A narrow trenching bucket for utilities and drainage.
- A grading bucket for backfilling and finish work.
- An auger for posts and small foundations.
- A breaker for concrete and masonry.
- A hydraulic coupler for faster bucket changes.
Then verify auxiliary hydraulic flow, pressure, connector type, return-line requirements, attachment weight, and whether the machine’s hydraulic cooling system is appropriate for continuous use. An attachment that physically fits may still perform poorly if the flow and pressure are mismatched.
Ownership cost: the purchase price is only part of it
General market pricing for new compact excavators in this class commonly falls in the tens of thousands of US dollars, with cabs, hydraulic thumbs, couplers, and premium attachments pushing the total substantially higher. Used machines can cost much less, but condition and service history create a wide spread.
A useful calculation is cost per billable use. Suppose a machine and essential attachments cost $65,000, expected resale value is $32,000 after 3,000 operating hours, and financing, insurance, storage, servicing, and repairs total $24,000 over ownership. Depreciation is $33,000, so the estimated ownership cost is $57,000, or about $19 per operating hour before fuel and labor. If the machine works only 150 hours per year, fixed costs per productive hour will be much higher than if it works 600 hours per year.
For occasional work, compare that figure with local rental rates. Buying tends to make more sense when the excavator will be used frequently, prevents repeated rental transport, or allows you to accept profitable jobs that require immediate availability.
Durability and maintenance realities
The first wear items are commonly bucket teeth, cutting edges, rubber tracks, track rollers, pins, bushings, hydraulic hoses, and attachment couplers. Abrasive soil accelerates wear, while operating with loose tracks can damage the undercarriage. Track tension should be checked according to the manual rather than tightened as much as possible.
- Grease boom, arm, bucket, and swing points at the specified intervals.
- Inspect hydraulic hoses for abrasion and leakage before each shift.
- Clean mud from the undercarriage before it hardens around rollers and idlers.
- Check engine oil, coolant, fuel filters, and hydraulic oil on schedule.
- Do not use the blade to bulldoze heavy material beyond the machine’s design.
- Allow hydraulic oil to warm before demanding full attachment flow.
- Replace worn bucket teeth before the adapter or bucket lip is damaged.
Service access is a buying criterion. Compare how easily the engine bay, filters, grease points, hydraulic tank, and battery can be reached. A slightly more expensive machine that gets maintained correctly may cost less than a cheaper machine neglected because routine servicing is awkward.
Final buying recommendation
Choose the Yanmar ViO17 or Kubota U17-3α when narrow access and work beside structures dominate. Choose the Bobcat E20 or JCB 19C-1 when digging depth and a heavier 1.9-ton platform matter more. Choose the Takeuchi TB216 when you have room for conventional tail swing and want a durable general-purpose machine.
Before signing, test the machine through the actual access route, weigh your complete transport package, request the lift chart, price the attachments you will need, and obtain service intervals and parts costs from the local dealer. For a small contractor, that practical verification is often more valuable than a minor advantage in horsepower or maximum digging depth.
